Comment on Developer creates endless Wikipedia feed to fight algorithm addiction

• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Its not presented as being specifically made without.

  There is plenty of room for more ethical algorithms and to get technical. It definitely does have a algorithm.

  A very basic formula that simulates randomness to pick one Wikipedia page after the other.

  I just wish i could customize that to my interests. So for example it favors articles tagged as ancient mythology and minimizes politicians from the 90s

  source

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Its not presented as being specifically made without? Wat

    Developer creates endless Wikipedia feed to fight algorithm addiction

    and spend spare moments of boredom without reaching for an algorithmically addictive social media app.

    without an invasive algorithm tracking you and pushing you toward the lowest-common-denominator content.

    Gemal is currently resisting calls to automatically tailor the stream of articles to the user’s interests based on what they express interest in.

    “I have had plenty of people message me and even make issues on my GitHub asking for some insane crazy WikiTok algorithm,” Gemal told Ars. “And I had to put my foot down and say something along the lines that we’re already ruled by ruthless, opaque algorithms in our everyday life; why can’t we just have one little corner in the world without them?”

    “I have no grand plans for some sort of insane monetized hyper-calculating TikTok algorithm,” Gemal told us. “It is anti-algorithmic, if anything.”

    Ill just repeat that last line again for you:

    “It is anti-algorithmic, if anything.”

    source

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There is no need to communicate like this. I actually had already learned about this app and checked it out yesterday on a different community with way less people and there was no article there. I just saw the opportunity of this post as way to discuss it.

      I like to make a few things clear that seem to cause confusion.

      1. I made my post in full understanding that it probably does not feature a “preference based algorithm”, trying it out did not gave it the impression it did. But i want to be more sure there is nothing along those lines included and tried to engage in discussion about the need for preferential settings. Its somewhere between a genuine and rhetoric question.

      2. Call me Pedantric, trough i prefer autistic but “algoritm” has like i explained a specific meaning to me. Its mathematical formula for a specific purpose. The app in question is code, code is math. You can not tell me that the app uses NO algorithm, well oc you can but to my brain that does not compute. And any kind of preferential features would

      3. I disagree this (and many things) require a full fledged article, just a clear few line description or like including those quotes you put up here would do for me. I know the internet likes to make everything into “news” but i don’t have to like or partake in that. I prefer to spend my time engaging on lemmy about the topic directly because that (this diverted discussion included) helps it grow.

      source