Comment on Why Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badly
Syntha@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoThe license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources
So as I understand it, under the OSI definition of the word, anything distributed under a copyleft licence would not be open source.
So all software with GNU GPL, for example.
airglow@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s incorrect. GPL licenses are open source.
The GPL does not restrict anyone from selling GPL-licensed software as a component of an aggregate software distribution.