No, because that would no longer be open in the open source sense.
It’s either open for everyone, or it isn’t open.
Comment on Why Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badly
dilroopgill@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No open source license type where corporations still have to pay?
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 month ago
airglow@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If you are referring to licenses that prohibit commercial use or prevent certain types of users from using the software, those licenses are not open source because they “discriminate against any person or group of persons”.