Comment on U16 Social Media Ban - Senate 1hr debate before the vote, some time tonight on the livestream
CTDummy@aussie.zone 1 month agoIf you think that’s a solid argument or one based in logic, good news. You’d probably make for an ideal liberal senator.
oahi@aussie.zone 1 month ago
Satire, I thought it was obvious.
CTDummy@aussie.zone 1 month ago
Welp went over my head, my bad, imma blame it on Poe’s law or something
oahi@aussie.zone 1 month ago
Well, I generally don’t consider satire to be a solid argument, it usuallp consisting of a joke and all. But if it makes people think, I’d consider it a win.
This bill is clearly not an effective solution for the stated problem. If you think it is, you’d probably make a good liberal senator.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 month ago
Yes, @oahi@oahi@aussie.zone was being critical of the Bill. Because it’s about as well thought-out as their satirical banning of children on public transport.
CTDummy@aussie.zone 1 month ago
I see a lot of people parroting surface level points provided by those in opposition to the bill but little addressing it. Especially the “social credit” nonsense. As mentioned in the debate digital ID wouldn’t be the only means for these social media companies to verify users. Though I agree that how it’s been rushed through is inappropriate.
oahi@aussie.zone 1 month ago
All good