Testing, test plans, and QA is not “mostly all”.
Let’s also stay on topic please. Its tagged appropriately and the relevant disclosure is present.
frongt@lemmy.zip 18 hours ago
Hardly none is mostly all.
Testing, test plans, and QA is not “mostly all”.
Let’s also stay on topic please. Its tagged appropriately and the relevant disclosure is present.
Yes that’s my point, they misphrased it
I read the original differently than you, but it seems its been edited in the meantime (and I’m on mobile at the moment)
Either way, I think all is well currently
It’s not my place to argue with your opinion.
Thank you for taking the time to share it anyway 😉
I mean when you say “hardly no AI” that means it was “mostly all” AI. I don’t think that’s what you meant to say.
English isn’t my first language, but no matter how many times I check my translation, it seems to make sense to me.
But anyway, I’m sure you understand the nuance in that sentence better than I do, so I’ll take it back just to be on the safe side
The original title was : [AIP] besstiolle/Timeline: my own tool for organizing my timeline diagrams with (hardly) no AI-generated content
I don’t know why besstiolle is getting downvoted when they are correct.
When people say that there is very little of something the natural way is “hardly any rain” for example. So if you “negate” the any to no, it means the opposite.
ho …
😱
Just a small point, double negatives can get pretty confusing. Even in English, you often have double negatives becoming a negative rather than a positive, e.g. “I didn’t go nowhere” or “You don’t know nothing”. Changing which part of the phrase you emphasise can also change that, for instance, if you said “I didn’t go nowhere” it implies that you did in fact go somewhere (double negative becomes a positive when stressing the second negative). This gets all the more confusing when you bring in other languages, since they all handle double negatives differently!