Comment

Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g

barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

That’s not what you wrote, and not what I complained about. You wrote:

BUT earth will move with gM/m1

where it was previously established that m1 and M are masses, and I interpreted g to be G (Newton’s gravitational constant) instead of g as in “gravitational acceleration caused by earth” because… well, I’m not actually sure. The whole thing is already a mess of capitalisation but more importantly then it’d be acceleration, not movement, worse, the specific properties of the earth are included twice (once in g, then in one of the mass terms).

the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you

Maybe you should spend less time on insulting people and more on communicating your thoughts clearly.

source

Sort:hotnew top

red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
tell me how gM/m1 is not acceleration

source
- barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  You said it was movement, aka change in position over time, not acceleration, or you would have said “x will accelerate at”, not “earth will move at”. I already explained why it’s questionable as a term of acceleration.
  
  And this could’ve been over after a single comment of you saying “oh, yeah, misspoke”. Your math checks out, that’s not the issue here, it’s your presentation that went all haywire.
  
  source
  - red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    literally trivil matter, i didnt even say movement, the point is your statements were still brain rot nonesense and your original comment is wrong and you dont really understand stuff
    
    source
    barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    Clarity of presentation is never a trivial matter. You can be right all you like if you don’t get it across then it will be for nought but inflating your own ego.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

Maybe you should spend less time on insulting people and more on communicating your thoughts clearly

meanwhile the communication

The whole thing is already a mess of capitalisation but more importantly then it’d be acceleration, not movement, worse, the specific properties of the earth are included twice (once in g, then in one of the mass terms).

man just leve i dont wanna communicate because you have no idea what you are talking about, i did give proper capitalusation in my comment, and earth properties included twice is another brain rot statement.

source