It’s not if you ask me, you cannot project the beliefs of 3000 people into 28 millions
That’s more than enough for a statistically significant sample.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 days ago
misk@piefed.social 2 days ago
For a binary choice where you expect distribution to be relatively similar you can do it with less than 400 while having 95% confidence and 5% margin of error. That’s just statistics and probability.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 days ago
Humans are not machines that decide things at random
misk@piefed.social 2 days ago
- We are machines made out of meat.
- It’s irrelevant if the choice was made at random or if it was based on some deep spiritual insight. We’re measuring outcomes, not the rationale.
Womble@piefed.world 2 days ago
I wish all the people who harp on about sample size would at least google it first before commenting that they no better than academics whose job this is.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 days ago
The academics knows too that 3000 people is a small pool to conclude something like
Womble@piefed.world 2 days ago
No, academics know how calculate sample size uncertanties.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 days ago
If you want to draw conclusions on the ideas of 28 million people i would say you would need to survey at last half of them, projecting the answers of 3000 people to the whole population of australia is a big generalization