I don’t think so, to be honest. The bitwarden-sdk had been there for a VERY long time and you could always compile without it. Not being able to build a FOSS client wouldn’t hurt bitwarden’s bottom line too much. Most people use whatever is provided in the app stores (which is compiled with the source available sdk).
Comment on Bitwarden Makes Change To Address Recent Open-Source Concerns
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 weeks agoThis seems like classic corporate backtracking when their customers spot a terrible, deliberate decision.
CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I didn’t think that’s the case here
However, would you rather that the feedback of users NOT change behavior? I’m not entirely sure what your end game is here, you WANT corporations to ignore and not take action on feedback?
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
Why do they have to “WANT” that? Why does that matter to the criticism? If it’s true, it’s true, and the fact that corporations are the ones in a position to habitually make terrible decisions about FOSS is a big problem. It’s valid to point out that it would be good to find a better way.
If anything it sounds like you “WANT” to ignore it.