Comment

Comment on Bitwarden Makes Change To Address Recent Open-Source Concerns

net00@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

There’s a big difference. You trust entities like bitwarden/lastpass/etc to properly encrypt the data, protect your master key, and trust their entire architecture behind the scenes.

When you encrypt the keepass DB that’s all done by you locally with a open source client. No one knows your master key, and you get a simple encrypted file. You can hand that file to hackers if you want, will be useless without the key.

I put one of the copies of my keepass on onedrive, and syncs perfectly across all devices.

Companies can enshiffity at a moments notice.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Lol, imagine ridiculing users for trusting an FOSS company to handle their password management, and then storing your encrypted password DB in Microsoft’s OneDrive 😆

source
- net00@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I knew a comment like this was coming, but unless you can show how microsoft can decrypt my kdbx I stand fully by my current setup.
  
  source
  - Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I don’t think Microsoft can decrypt your DB file, neither do I think Bitwarden can. Encryption happens locally on their open source clients too.
    
    But I’m not the one disparaging trusting an open source program to securely encrypt passwords, you are.
    
    source
  - Bezier@suppo.fi ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Could you please show how bitwarden can decrypt a vault that’s locally encrypted by a foss client?
    
    “Imagine trusting any company with your passwords”
    
    source
    Llewellyn@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    They created the client. In theory, they can have some backdoors.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Llewellyn@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  encrypted is the key word
  
  source
Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I do not trust bitwarden to encrypt my data anymore than anyone trusts keypass to encrypt my data.

They’re both open source, you’re plainly mistaken.

source
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
And you are aware that bitwarden knows nothing about the passwords inside the vault and the vault is encrypted in zero knowledge type of fashion?
AND that Bitwarden does external audits?
AND if you loose your master password you are out of luck as they can’t support you helping crack the decryption?

source
cley_faye@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Except for the part that it’s not a question of trust (being open source), there’s no third-party architecture to trust (it can and should be self-hosted), the data on the server are also encrypted client-side before leaving your device, sure.

Oh, and you also get proper sync, no risk of desync if two devices gets a change while offline without having to go check your in-house sync solution, easy share between user (still with no trust needed in the server), all working perfectly with good user UI integration for almost every systems.

Yeah, I wonder why people bother using that, instead of deploying clunky, single-user solution.

source