Comment on Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Source
486@lemmy.world 4 weeks agoBitWarden already has lots of clients.
Are there? I’d be very much interested to know. I’ve been looking for other clients before, because I didn’t like the sluggishness of the Electron client, but couldn’t find any usable clients at all. There are some projects on Github, none of which seemed to be in a usable state. Perhaps I have been missing something.
This is being blown a bit out of proportion though. All they are saying is the official SDK may have some non-free components going forward. So what? It’s a private company, they can do what they want. Or the community can just fork it and move forward with a free one if they want, but it’s just not going to be in the official BitWarden clients. Hardly news or a big deal.
Nobody said that they can’t do that (although people rightfully questioned that their changes are indeed comatible with the GPLv3). I very much disagree that this isn’t a big deal, though.
MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I use Keyguard on my phone. Loving it so far. Mostly focused on Android but also available for all major platforms.
JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Keyguard is not open-source, only source-available.
486@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Thanks, I haven’t seen that one before, but I’d really prefer an open source application.