He was reacting to alerts, complying to them by simply touching the steering wheel. He did that 150 times during that 45 minute trip ( not all the trip was on auto pilot).
So if the guy died the car would of disengaged auto pilot (I’m not sure how this works).
You check the video in the article. It’s quite informative
NathanielThomas@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The video showed that the guy behind the wheel was drunk and letting autopilot work. Apparently autopilot recognized the the emergency vehicles with only 37 metres to impact but instead of braking the system disengaged completely allowing the car to impact at nearly 100 km/h.
Wats0ns@programming.dev 1 year ago
Isn’t that in purpose tho ? Like “hey if we’re not sure to be able to break on time, just disengage so it’s not our responsibility anymore”?
iwidji@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If we want to get really technical, the NSTB is requiring all new cars to have emergency braking so in this situation, the car should slam on the brakes. Even if it can’t slow down fast enough to prevent a crash, it should slow down enough to minimize it.
Is this particular Tesla under said law? Probably not. But I think we can see why this tactic is the infinitely safer and more ethical option than saying “good luck, control this car on your own and enjoy this 100 km crash otherwise”
tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 1 year ago
Tesla has AEB but by the time something like that triggers you’re reducing the severity of the crash not eliminating it.
It’s likely the car braked at 100km/h but was still doing 50 when it hit… at those speeds it’s fatal whatever happens.
Bookmeat@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You don’t answer the question.
NathanielThomas@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t know the answer to the question but it’s probably that Tesla should have an auto-braking system if it’s got an autopilot.