The problem is that it validates the claim to offer a “solution” (it isn’t) to the “problem” (it isn’t). It’s counter productive to validate the claim by offering this retort.
I’d be more than happy with seeing these things repurposed into something useful. If we’re in a position where windmill blades are littering the landscape because we have a preponderance of cheap/ free/ non polluting energy, that’s a good thing.
YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Assuming this is a non-issue like you say, I still don’t see why that makes this a problem?
Why? This makes it seem like we can only concentrate on one issue at a time and that by making biodegradable blades we’re somehow stopping something more ‘worthwhile’ from happening? We can do multiple things at once. Even if this makes only a minor difference, I still don’t see why that’s a bad thing? Surely any attempt to improve things is a good thing, no?
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You are validating bad faith criticisms by engaging with them. You give them substance by addressing them.