Comment on A courts reporter wrote about a few trials. Then an AI decided he was actually the culprit.
Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 4 days agoSo you think these compilations should have no liability for the misinformation they spit out. Awesome. That’s gonna end well. Welcome to digital snake oil, y’all.
lunarul@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I did not say companies should have no liability for publishing misinformation. Of course if someone uses AI to generate misinformation and tries to pass it off as factual information they should be held accountable. But it doesn’t seem like anyone did that in this case. Just a journalist putting his name in the AI to see what it generates. Nobody actually spread those results as fact.