Comment on A courts reporter wrote about a few trials. Then an AI decided he was actually the culprit.

<- View Parent
kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

If we’ve learned any lesson from the internet, it’s that once something exists it never goes away.

Sure, people shouldn’t believe the output of their prompt. But if you’re generating that output, a site can use the API to generate a similar output for a similar request. A bot can generate it and post it to social media.

Yeah, don’t trust the first source you see. But if the search results are slowly being colonized by AI slop, it gets to a point where the signal-to-noise ratio is so poor it stops making sense to only blame the poor discernment of those trying to find the signal.

source
Sort:hotnewtop