If one person chooses to be asexual after having a healthy sex drive that does not mean the other person has to be asexual aswell. Why is this such a hard concept for you?
Comment on Very thankful
Emerald@lemmy.world 5 days agoThey aren’t being neglected just because someone doesn’t want to have sex with them. That’s such a strange take.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Emerald@lemmy.world 5 days ago
You don’t seem to know what asexual means. Asexual doesn’t mean someone who doesn’t have sex. Asexual is someone who doesn’t experience sexual attraction.
But anyways, of course the other person is free to break up and find someone else who will have sex with them. However, they aren’t being neglected. Nobody owes someone their body.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 days ago
What’s with the pedentry? If they feel no sexual attraction to their partner and therefore never have sex the difference between that and asexuality is trivial. No is forcing them to have sex. They just not longer are a participant in a loving, caring, marriage.
Emerald@lemmy.world 5 days ago
That’s certainly a better take then arguing they are being neglected
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
You don’t seem to understand that they are inside a mandatory pact of sexual abstinence except with each other. That is what marriage is. She ensnared him to be his provider for life and to swear off sex with anyone else. And then decided to refuse having sex entirely You want your argument to have legs ? THEN KILL MANDATORY SEXUAL EXCLUSIVITY IN MARRIAGES
Emerald@lemmy.world 4 days ago
That’s a situation for people in individual marriages to make, not me.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Yes it should be an add-on choice they can make. Not this vile default !