Comment on Lemmy wouldn't really takeoff to replace Reddit until it's content is search indexable
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Even if it’s indexed, there’s no single website to search for so even if I add “Lemmy” to help, it won’t look for content where Lemmy isn’t mentioned.
The mistake that was made was making the decentralization something that affects the front end. If the backend was decentralized and the front end was a single default website with people being able to create alternatives (but everyone being guaranteed access to all the content), that wouldn’t be an issue. We could tell new users “Sign up on Lemmy.com and if you decide you don’t like the UI just choose an alternative and use the same credentials to sign in.” No one would know you’re using a different UI, all content would be searchable by adding site:lemmy.com to your query.
mark@programming.dev 2 months ago
A centralized frontend and a decentralized backend seems great in theory, but I’m not quite sure that’s even possible without some one or some group owning the centralized frontend. And if one single entity controls the frontend, it defeats the purpose of decentralization. We want to avoid anyone person or group owning any part of the flow of our communication,
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
That’s why you make the backend available to all to develop a front end, but there’s a default option just called Lemmy that helps solve the indexing and getting people started issue. If the Lemmy default option becomes shit the data is still available and something else becomes the default option.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I agree it gets complex for users. But pushing back a bit, wouldn’t we instead say:
I have in mind that the top blocked instances are pedo oriented. Also seems like it would create a liability issue for servers mirroring that content.
Although it’s not a perfect solution to choose a default instance for new users, I do think it’s a powerful question to eliminate.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Hosts could choose to host NSFW content or not, right now they have the exact same issue anyway so the current situation is no better…