Comment on School Monitoring Software Sacrifices Student Privacy for Unproven Promises of Safety.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 week agoNo you did not. You just stated that this was the case. I’m asking why that is/should be acceptable.
Why is it normal to put monitoring software on?
Why does a 3rd party need to monitor it?
What are they monitoring that would be considered acceptable?
I honestly ask, because I can’t think of any reason.
Or is this similar to “mass shootings are a fact of life”?
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Clear as day. Glad we cleared this up.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Troll… that is not an explanation on why.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Yes it is an explanation why.
Your question: Why is/should this be acceptable.
My answer: These are school issued machines, and like all machines issued by a 3rd party for use under their supervision, they come with monitoring software.
It is acceptable because it is the schools property and they can do as they wish with it. Everyone else is free to not use those machines.
This is not a hard thing to grasp.
But since you are just being combative we are done here.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That is not an explanation on why this is the case. Cowardly slinking away into the shadows is par for the course.
Just for thought:
I’ll bet a dollar the answer to this all is NO.
The whole pro company schtick is getting old.