Well of course you gotta think, Reddit and Twitter were also probably getting a lot more hits than Low Tech Mag 😅
Comment on A solar powered website that goes offline when there's no power
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days agoI would be curious to know this uptime relative to any other self-hosted sites.
I remember Reddit and Twitter constantly suffering from uptime issues and they were far more decentralized, with modern infrastructure to match.
Is 95.2% all that far out of the realm of expectation?
kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 3 days ago
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 days ago The part I quoted was one of their many tries. It seems now, after changing out the solar panel and battery, that they have greatly improved over 95.2%.
ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
95% isn’t great. I run my own servers on solar and I don’t think I’ve had more than a hourof unexpected downtime in the last 3 years, excluding the usual update reboots.
Well, the article did go on to provide better stats once they changed out the panel and battery: