@afeinman@wandering.shop @lproven@vivaldi.net
If it matters, I'm not the only person who thinks this way.
Given enough time, you can also be largely "immune" to advertising. This is why they are continuously inventing new methods and channels. The problem is you don't have that time when it comes to what advertising is attempting to accomplish.
If we restrict attention to corporate natural language sludge and its ilk, then there is no difference to see between that and LLM generated text, maybe. But restricting to that sample skews the results in favor of the preferred conclusion, does it not?
From where I sit, thinking you can "spot" AI is holding onto a fragile, now-shattered fantasy, just like thinking you're immune to advertising.In my 40s I took a poetry workshop that involved a reading of Frost and even though I'd read "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" countless times before it, I came out of the experience with a wholly different read. I am convinced an LLM cannot produce text that has this kind of depth. Can someone see that on a spot reading? Maybe not. But over time? Surely.
If it matters, I'm not the only person who thinks this way.
Given enough time, you can also be largely "immune" to advertising. This is why they are continuously inventing new methods and channels. The problem is you don't have that time when it comes to what advertising is attempting to accomplish.
If we restrict attention to corporate natural language sludge and its ilk, then there is no difference to see between that and LLM generated text, maybe. But restricting to that sample skews the results in favor of the preferred conclusion, does it not?